Kevlar is an aromatic polyamide, (aramid). It is a para isomer that is produced from p-phenylenediamine with isophthaloyl chloride. Kevlar has very high strength and is used as a tire cord and, with short fibers, as a substitute for
asbestos, for example, in high-temperature gaskets. It is also used as reinforcement in bulletproof vests. To make kevlar fabric, rods of the polymer, polyparaphenylene terephthalamide, are extruded through spinnerets to produce fine fibers which are spun together o make yarns that can be woven.
Handbook of Manufacturing Process, James G. Bralla, p.703
(Previous description)(better)
2)Value Analysis(better)(Production)
Handbook of Manufacturing Process, James G. Bralla, p.703
(Previous description)(better)
Kevlar
The most widely known aramid is Kevlar, formed by the reaction between 1,4-diaminobenzene and benzene—1,4-dioyl chloride. Molecules of Kevlar consist of benzene rings linked together by amide groups at diametrically opposed carbon atoms. For this reason Kevlar is classified as a para aramid, “para” being the term used to identify the relative positions of chemical groups on opposite sides of the same benzene ring.
Kevlar is resistant to abrasion, mildew, most solvents, and many common chemicals, such as fuels and lubricants. It retains most of these properties a temperatures as high as 350˚F (180˚C) and is difficult to ignite. Kevlar decomposes at around 7200˚F (4000˚C) without melting.
While the strength of Kevlar makes it an extremely useful material, it also makes it a difficult substance to cut and machine. Conventional cutting tools –serrated scissors, shears, and saws, for example- can be used provided due attention is paid to sharpness and the conditions of use. Advanced cutting tools, such as lasers and high-energy water jets, are better suited to the job.
A weak point of Kevlar, its low compressive strength, which makes it prone to crumble under large compressive forces, can be overcome by using Kevlar in composites with materials of high compressive strength, such as glass fiber.
(Cavendish M., How It Works: Science And Technology, 3rd Edition, page 1805)
2)Value Analysis(better)(Production)
The value analysis approach requires, first of all, that valid and complete answers be developed for the following five questions:
1. What is the item or service?
2. What does it cost?
3. What does it do?
4. What else would do the job?
5. What would that alternative cost?
These basic questions serve the end of uncovering needed pertinent facts. With the establishment of answers to them, the foundation is laid for developing objective data for presentation to the decision makers. Hence the importance of understanding and effectively using these questions cannot be overemphasized. W hat is the item or service? This question is usually quite readily determined from objective data. What does it cost? Here the answer is often obtainable from effective and meaningful cost data, but sometimes such costs are dacult to obtain. This will be further developed in technique 2 of the more results techniques presented in Chapter 8. What does it do? For the moment, all else except precisely the question, "What does it do?" must be disregarded. This means that we put aside such questions as:
What machines does the factory have?
What processes does the factory customarily use?
What special skills do the factory people have?
What special skills are available in the drafting and planning organi-
zations?
What would that alternative cost? Handbooks are full of information
on the properties of various products and materials and suggested uses
for them. Notably absent from most of these is cost. This is quite under-
standable. Costs vary from time to time while the properties of materials
and their functions are relatively stable. Furthermore, as our civilization
has developed, it has been a basic necessity to find materials which,
within the appropriate size and weight range, accomplished the neces-
sary functions. Therefore, the handbooks contain the information needed.
for these pursuits. When value is the objective, it becomes vital to have
meaningful costs for decision making. Hence the question of the cost of
alternatives must be effectively and objectively answered.
Meaningful costs may be obtained from a variety of sources or from a
combination of sources:
The cost department
Cost analyses
Catalogues
Suppliers of products or materials
Special cost studies
But since, in many instances of good value work, materials, products,
and processes will be utilized in different ways, really meaningful costs
often must be worked up for the job. This does not mean that it is
necessary to have perfection in cost data at this stage in the cycle. Costs
within a range of plus or minus 5 per cent will usually be suflicient, and
often, costs within a range of plus or minus 10 per cent will help to
determine whether the particular value alternatives are of sdficient in-
terest to warrant more exact cost determination and further study.
At the risk of appearing too emphatic about this important point, the
value specialist must not be too concerned about the comment, "Beware
of the situation in which precise costs are not provided." His concern
must rather center on statements such as, "Tools are too costly; it is not
even worthwhile to provide an estimate on them" or "The quantities are
so small that we know the process will not be practicable; therefore we
will not provide an estimate" or "We have studied this a number of times
and always found it impracticable; it is therefore not worthwhile to pre-
pare an estimate on it now." Such beliefs and habits of the past often lock
in large amounts of unsuspected and unnecessary costs.
Admittedly, all these additional questions embrace considerations that
will enter into decision making, but at this stage of value analysis, the
establishment of sound criteria for decision making is handicapped if any
of these questions are allowed to interfere with the effective generation
of objective data such as, "It conducts current," "It excludes dust," "It
supports the operator," "It separates dials," "It mounts the motor," "It
mounts the control."
What else would do the job? This is not a superficial question; it is a
penetrating one. The comprehensiveness of the answer to that simple
question governs, to a high degree, the effectiveness and the grade of
value work being done. No matter how skilled the searcher and no matter
how diligent and creative his search, there will always remain alternatives
which he did not bring into focus, many of which would have accom-
plished the total performance reliably at very much lower cost. To ensure
good value content, many of the special techniques and much of the
special knowledge of value analysis must be used in getting substantial
answers to this question. The approach here is to search intensively for
alternatives by:
Studying handbooks
Perusing trade literature
Telephoning people who might have pertinent information
Writing to specialists and to companies who might know of effective
alternatives
Focusing intense creativity sharply on the precise task to be accom-
plished
Refining the results of these creative sessions and searching further for
additional information
Unless this phase of the work is effectively and penetratingly done, it
cannot be hoped that the product will have more than an average degree
of value.
What would that alternative cost? Handbooks are full of information
on the properties of various products and materials and suggested uses
for them. Notably absent from most of these is cost. This is quite under-
standable. Costs vary from time to time while the properties of materials
and their functions are relatively stable. Furthermore, as our civilization
has developed, it has been a basic necessity to find materials which,
within the appropriate size and weight range, accomplished the neces-
sary functions. Therefore, the handbooks contain the information needed.
for these pursuits. When value is the objective, it becomes vital to have
meaningful costs for decision making. Hence the question of the cost of
alternatives must be effectively and objectively answered.
Meaningful costs may be obtained from a variety of sources or from a
combination of sources:
The cost department
Cost analyses
Catalogues
Suppliers of products or materials
Special cost studies
But since, in many instances of good value work, materials, products,
and processes will be utilized in different ways, really meaningful costs
often must be worked up for the job. This does not mean that it is
necessary to have perfection in cost data at this stage in the cycle. Costs
within a range of plus or minus 5 per cent will usually be suflicient, and
often, costs within a range of plus or minus 10 per cent will help to
determine whether the particular value alternatives are of sdficient in-
terest to warrant more exact cost determination and further study.
At the risk of appearing too emphatic about this important point, the
value specialist must not be too concerned about the comment, "Beware
of the situation in which precise costs are not provided." His concern
must rather center on statements such as, "Tools are too costly; it is not
even worthwhile to provide an estimate on them" or "The quantities are
so small that we know the process will not be practicable; therefore we
will not provide an estimate" or "We have studied this a number of times
and always found it impracticable; it is therefore not worthwhile to pre-
pare an estimate on it now." Such beliefs and habits of the past often lock
in large amounts of unsuspected and unnecessary costs.
Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering 3rd Edition, Lawrence D. Miles, p.18
(Previous description)
Value Analysis:
Value analysis is a system that evaluates each step in design, materials, process, and operations in order to manufacture a product that performs all of its intended functions and does so at the lowest possible cost.
The value of a product defined as:
Value = Product function and performance / Product cost
Value analysis generally consists of the following six phases:
1. Information phase: to gather data and determine costs.
2. Analysis phase: to define functions and identify problem areas as well as opportunities.
3. Creativity phase: to seek ideas to respond to problems and opportunities without judging the value of each of these ideas.
4. Evaluation phase: to select the ideas to be developed and to identify the costs involved.
5. Implementation phase: to present facts, costs, and values to the company managament; to develop a plan, and to motivate positive action, all in order to obtain a commitment of the resources necessary to accomplish the task.
6. Review phase: in which the overall value-analysis process is reviewed and necessary adjustments are made.
(Kalpakjian S., Schmid S.R., Manufacturing engineering and technology, 1266)
(Previous description)
Value Analysis:
Value analysis is a system that evaluates each step in design, materials, process, and operations in order to manufacture a product that performs all of its intended functions and does so at the lowest possible cost.
The value of a product defined as:
Value = Product function and performance / Product cost
Value analysis generally consists of the following six phases:
1. Information phase: to gather data and determine costs.
2. Analysis phase: to define functions and identify problem areas as well as opportunities.
3. Creativity phase: to seek ideas to respond to problems and opportunities without judging the value of each of these ideas.
4. Evaluation phase: to select the ideas to be developed and to identify the costs involved.
5. Implementation phase: to present facts, costs, and values to the company managament; to develop a plan, and to motivate positive action, all in order to obtain a commitment of the resources necessary to accomplish the task.
6. Review phase: in which the overall value-analysis process is reviewed and necessary adjustments are made.
(Kalpakjian S., Schmid S.R., Manufacturing engineering and technology, 1266)
3) Ergonomics(better)(Manufacturing)
The subject of ergonomics is equally important to both types of designer and represents the
overlap between industrial and engineering design. The word 'ergonomics' stems from two
Greek words; 'ergos' meaning work and *nomos' meaning the laws. In the USA *human
engineering' finds favour and in continental Europe the expression *biotechnics' is often
used.
Engineering ergonomics is concerned with ways of designing machines, operations and
work environments to match human capacities and limitations. During the Second World
War a new category of machine appeared which made demands on sensory, perceptual,
judgemental and decision-making abilities rather than muscular power. This new class of
machine posed some interesting questions about human abilities that could no longer be
answered by common sense and time and motion studies. Consider the design of a manned
space vehicle. Almost everything known about human beings is important: body
dimensions; physiological reactions; sensory capacities; control abilities; eating, drinking
and waste disposal; psychological effects of fatigue and emotion. Happily, for most
designers, we are only usually concerned with a restricted part of the human sensory
repertory.
Engineering Design Principles, Ken Hurst, p.76
(Previous description)
4) Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA)(better)(manufacturing)
(Previous description)
Ergonomics
Ergonomics is the study of people while they use equipment in specific environments to perform certain tasks. Ergonomics seeks to minimize adverse effects of the environment upon people and thus to enable each person to maximize his or her contribution to a given job.
(Cherie Berry,A Guide of Ergonomics, pg6)
4) Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA)(better)(manufacturing)
Any engineering designer, whether or not working as part of a team with manufacturing
engineers, requires a working knowledge of manufacturing methods. Good practice
dictates that during all stages of the design process advice is sought from manufacturing
experts and the designer should attempt to utilize existing machinery and tooling where
possible.
Assuming that possible interference of components or gross errors in the 'logic' of
assembly are detected during the execution of the scheme drawing, a design should be
suitable for machining and assembly if the following are critically appraised:
• ease of machining
• economy
• use of existing machinery and tooling
• avoidance of redundant fits
• accessibility
• ease of assembly.
In designing for ease of machining it is important not to simply consider the functiona-
lity of the design but also to consider manufacturing process requirements. Although not
exhaustive. Figs 5.8, 5.9, 5.10 and 5.11 give some examples which illustrate the principles
involved in simplifying manufacture.
Figure 5.8 illustrates provision of runouts for cutting tools. A poor finish may result or a component may be impossible to manufacture without runouts. The decision to provide
such undercuts must be taken at the design stage since the smaller diameter may have
strength reduction implications.
The simplification of machining can also be achieved by the placing of features in the
components which are easiest to machine and subsequently inspect. This is true of the
grooves which are required for some sort of rubber sealing ring in the example shown in
Fig, 5.9. If the grooves are designed to go on the inside of the housing then access for
machining is difficult. If it is functionally acceptable to insert the grooves in the shaft then
this should be done because turning the grooves in the shaft is much more straight forward.
In order to facilitate drilling, clearance must be provided for the drill to break through
fully, drills should encounter equal resistance on their cutting edges so should not enter on
a sloping surface and the centre of holes should be at least a full diameter away from the
edge of a component to avoid breaking out.
Engineering Design Principles, Ken Hurst, p.73
(Previous description)
(Previous description)
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA)
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly is a natural outcome of developments which recognizes the inherent interrelationship amont the manufacturing of components and their assembly into a final product. (manufacturing engineering and technology-Serope kalpakjian, page 16)
5) Design for Assembly (better) (manufacturing)
Large numbers of engineering components
and machines fail simply because they are not assembled properly. Precision rotating
machines such as engines, gearboxes and turbines have closely specified running
clearances and cannot tolerate much misalignment in assembly. This applies even
more to smaller components such as bearings, couplings and seals. Reliability can be
improved therefore by designing a component so that it can only be assembled
accurately. This means using design features such as keys, locating lugs, splines,
guides and locating pins which help parts assemble together accurately. It is also
useful to incorporate additional measures to make it impossible to assemble
components the wrong way round or back-to-front. Accurate assembly can definitely
improve reliability (although you won't find a mathematical theory explaining
why).
Case Studies in Engineering Design, Clifford Matthews, p.137
(Previous description)
Design for Assembly:
Assembly is an important phase of the overall manufacturing operation and requires consideration of the ease, speed and the cost of putting parts together. Furthermore, products must be designed so that disassembly is also possible, in order to enable the product to be taken apart with relative ease for maintenance, servicing and recycling of its components. Because assembly operations can contribute significantly to product cost, design for assembly, as well as design for disassembly, are important aspects of manufacturing. Typically, a product that is easy to assemble is also easy to disassemble. Further important developments include design for service, the goal of which is that individual parts or sub-assemblies in a product be easy to reach and service.
(Kalpakjian S., Schmid S.R., Manufacturing engineering and technology, pg 15)
(Previous description)
Design for Assembly:
Assembly is an important phase of the overall manufacturing operation and requires consideration of the ease, speed and the cost of putting parts together. Furthermore, products must be designed so that disassembly is also possible, in order to enable the product to be taken apart with relative ease for maintenance, servicing and recycling of its components. Because assembly operations can contribute significantly to product cost, design for assembly, as well as design for disassembly, are important aspects of manufacturing. Typically, a product that is easy to assemble is also easy to disassemble. Further important developments include design for service, the goal of which is that individual parts or sub-assemblies in a product be easy to reach and service.
(Kalpakjian S., Schmid S.R., Manufacturing engineering and technology, pg 15)
tanımların güzel eline sağlık ancak"Value Analysis" tanımında kullandığın kaynağın devamında yani 19.sayfada üç soru daha var(ben yazıyorum);
ReplyDeleteWhat equipment must be liquidated?
What buildings must work be provided for?
What people in what areas must be kept busy?
bu soruları da eklersen daha iyi olur, çünkü yarım gibi oluyor kaynakçadan alıntın.
tanım düzeltildi.
ReplyDelete