Shock Wave Forming (Forming Process)
Shock Wave Forming
There is no old answer.
Shock Wave Forming (new)(better)
A shoch wave generated by the explosion of a 10 mg silver
azide pellet was impinged on a 1.5 mm diameter air bubble placed at the
standoff distance of 20 mm from the center of explosive. At the final stage of
bubble collapse, a micro-water jet was generated. Its terminal velocity was
found to be approximately 100 m/s, which resulted in stegnation pressure of 150
Mpa. This effect was found to be very sensitive to the bubble shape and the
shock overpressure. A planar shock wave colliding on a plane interface, the
local radius of curvature of the interface is critical which determines the jet
formation.
Taking various applications into consideration, we have
visulized shock/bubble interaction in water, silicone oil, and golden syrup
having kinematic viscosity varying from 1 cSt to 10 kSt. The response of shock
loaded bubbles was more or less analogous for most of liquids for a wide range
of kinematic viscosity. However, in the case of golden syrup of kinematic
viscosity exceeding 6 kSt, the detonation product gases did not expand largely
but numerous cracks were developed irregularly to the radial direction. A silver
azide pellet was ignited by the irradiation of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser beam
of 7 ns pulse duration and 20 mJ pulse energy directly on its surface or
through a 0.6 mm diameter optical fiber through which the pulse laser beam was
transmitted.
Glass mentioned that a shock tube is a test tube of modern
aerodynamic experiments. Shock tubes were designed and constructed by various
design concepts. Traditionally shock waves are generated by rupturing a
diaphram which is seperating test gases from high-pressure driver gases. However,
the diaphram rupture can never be precisely controlled even with keeping
identical initial contion. The projected area of ruptured diaphram sections can
never be identical for each run so that the mass flow through it varies. The resulting
shock Mach number scatters in every shot. This trend becomes more pronounced in
higher shock Mach numbers.
In order to overcome this demerit, we have decided to use a
reusable rubber membrane as a replacement of rupturing diaphrams. Bulged with
auxiliary high-pressure, it seperated test gas from high-pressure driver gas. Then
quick release of the auxiliary high-pressure contracted the expanded membrane. The
high-pressure driver gas rashed into the test section forming a shock wave. We constructed
a diaphram-less shock tube consisting of a 290 mm diameter and 2 m long high
high pressure chamber inside which a 600 mm x 150 mm and 4 m long low pressure
channel was placed in the coaxial arrangement. A rubber membrane was placed at
the end of high-pressure chamber facing to the low pressure channel. The auxiliary
high-pressure chamber was connected to this part. Although diaphram-less
operation may slightly elongate the shock formation distance but is so simple
that the scatter of shock Mach numbers becomes +-0.25% for Ms ranging from 1.1
to 2.0 in air.
(Shock Waves: Proceedings of the 24th International
Symposium on Shock Waves, Yazar: Zonglin Jiang, Z. Y. Han,page:6)
Eray daha açıklayıcı bir cevap bulabilirsen güzel olur, kolay gelsin...
ReplyDelete